On State cryptocurrency

In terms of the power if gives its frightening.

But as with all powerful things imagine the good that could be done with it.

Being able to program the nature of money.

Could make it so that after a certain amount of time it stops being valid… which would make people stop seeing money as something to save for a rainy day with and start seeing actual resources and the things to save.

Would also encourage spending of the money which is what money is actually for macro economically.

One persons spending is another person’s earning.

So saving is actual bad for the economy and society as a whole.

Which is one of the reasons money supply has to increase.

To escape the deflationary trap…

(Basically imagine money is a finite quantity.

Now imagine there is a group of people.

Some produce goods and sell them.

Some buy them and work for the producers

Now then the producer buys materials to produce goods, pays wages and then with the profit he spends some on what he wants and he saves some.

The other group spend some money and save some money.

Thats a cycle.

Now you see that at the end of every cycle there will be less money.

And because there is less money people will panic and be unsure.

And this makes people save more.

So less and less money every cycle.

The only way around it is to increase the money supply…. but this has its own inflationary cycle.

The problem at the moment is that it is humans, corruptible humans who are playing the balancing game of increasing and decreasing monetary supply.

If money were programmable you could simply program it to have a sell by date thus encouraging spending and you could just have a supply of money that was equivalent to x population.

You might ask “why wouldn’t the people just use something else that allowed them to save?

Money is based on force. The reason it has any value at all is because the biggest bully with the only gun in the playground is demanding taxes and fines off you… but I’ve rambled enough lol

Apotheosis

The whole subtext of the story is that through an act of disobedience they became godlike.

And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil:

Gen 3.22

A slave obeys.

The subtext of scripture if one has ears to hear it and eyes to see it is that good and evil are both conspiring to apotheosis man.

I think Jesus was killed for preaching openly with proof that man is god. He proclaimed it saying I am the son of God and his other title is I am the son of mankind.

He in himself proclaims an identity of those terms

The only place god can reside is here in the present and god permeates and creates spontaneously the moment leaving in its wake two illusions past and future.

Only that is metaphor god is the moment and its contents.

If God has a will then it resides in man and like white light passing through a prism multiplies into an infinity of distinct and mutually exclusive things (red is not blue) so no-will refracted through the prismatic mind shards called brains spawns a legion of enemies running in subtle permutation through the gamat of possible desires.

When does the bible claim the last days happened?

Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.

1 corinthians 10:11.

Whos speaking? Paul.

Whos he talking to? Corinthians Christians alive before ad 70

Where? Some Greek place and maybe Rome i can’t remember where Paul was when he wrote that epistle.

And finally when is he speaking? Some time between 33 ad and 70 ad.

So when did the last days happen according to the bible? Some time during the 1st century ad

If the bible is true the ends days have already happened like 2000 years ago.

If the end days haven’t already happened 2000 years ago then either 1. The bible doesn’t mean what you mean by end days or 2. The bible is bullshit.

Have you ever come across modern monetary theory (mmt)?

Most people think of the state or government as a household.

You know we get money from outside and it is a limited resource for us.

We work for it.

But this thinking is not applicable to the state. Well as long as that state is sovereign.

Which is to say it issues it’s own currency.

If you issue your own currency you have an infinite capacity to spend.

Now there are limits to what the state can expend but these are self imposed limits.

Well one that I know of. Inflation.

Which is where you have too much money (demand) chasing after to few goods (supply).

But this is never actually an issue in an economy as long as you don’t have full employment.

Basically as long as the money you issue corresponds to the goods and services you pay people to create then inflation isnt a problem.

The issue in our system is that we have 2 sources of money.

1 the state. And 2. The private banking sector.

The private banking sector issues currency by taking advantage of the fractional reserve system.

Basically if the state or us puts $10 into a bank then the bank can issue $100 in loans off the back of that 10.

Now we do have inflation in our system.

In the housing market.

And this is because most money is now issued by banks and most of that money is issued out as mortgages for houses.

This money isnt going to build new houses it is going to change ownership of the house.

Thus a massive inflation in housing price over the last 30 to 40 years.

Yeah so what it means is that the state has this massive capacity to deal with recession. Just print money from thin air… ok paper… to get people to produce the stuff needed.

The foundation of it is tax and fines.

Not for revenue.

The state never needs money from you.

The reason for tax and fines is that it’s a use of force to make people need whatever they designate as the currency.

Everyone in america has to give me dollars (it could be anything I choose) or you go to prison or cant do things you want.

The foundation for the value of money is always and has to be (on scales which are necessarily anonymous) a threat of some kind.

I’m probably boring you lol but to be fair I dont care I love listening to my nut

On purpose

Purpose is self refuting.

The assumption is that we need purpose to live.

The problem then is not how to achieve the purpose.

That’s the last thing you want if purpose is what gives life value.

The problem is what to do once the purpose is achieved?

Really purposes are excuses we use to motivate us to play the game.

But the game is fun in and of itself.

It doesnt need an excuse (read purpose).

You want to live?

Why?

Because you want to live.

But instead of standing confidently on that desire we seek to fence ourselves in, to make our position secure.

We feel like we need to justify being here!

That we need a reason.

Please sir dont chuck me out I have a job to do.

I am useful.

I am a slave so let me stay here.

Let me continue living

The depths are there to hide the shallows!

The depths are there to hide the shallows.

Let me unpack.

We have these grand concepts like “good”, “bad”, “love” and “loyalty” (not an exhaustive list)

But all anyone really means when they say something is bad is “I dont like it” or “i dont want that to happen to me” and when they say something is good ” i like it” “I would like it to happen to me”

Love. Romantic love between sexual partners is just window dressing for lust aka “I wanna fuck that”. That is what all the heart pumping, clammy hands… all the physical symptoms of being in love basically to do with arousal.

The heart pumps to engorge and prepare genitals.

Friendship may be the only true deep with nothing to hide but even there it’s not deep. It’s just people enjoying each others character.

(I hope one day to have lust and friendship combined)

And finally loyalty. Oh such a deep profound sentiment. Translated: loyalty = “I want you to be mine to back me up when I’m wrong to deny yourself in favour of me”

Again the running theme through all these sentiments is selfishness, self centred ness. Which isnt necessarily bad but we are ashamed of this in us so we seek to hide it behind this fictions.

We dont need to hide. It would be better to be blatant about what we want with each other.

The depths are there to hide the shallows but the shallows don’t need to be hid.

Just a bit of news about subjective insights.

Subjective insights aka me Christopher Jack has started making youtube videos.

I already have a lot of content up.

Most of it is short and sweet like these blogs.

Limit each video to 5 minutes.

Apart from the book studies which just go on as long as we feel like it in the sesh.

I invite anyone to start book studies with me on my youtube.

Just ask dont be afraid I love studying with people.

Currently have one of me and an American friend bringing out the non-dual teaching of the gospel of John.

The 2nd part is on his channel.

And me and my friend ethan going through Manly P Halls the secret teachings.

Would like someone or some people to start going through a book called the social construction of reality with me.

Anyway yeah check it out. Hi go easy on me I only got the guts to start talking to the camera 8 days ago.

Actually dont go easy. No holes barred I’m a big boy haha.

I’m god!

 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCx3Xfx8QhugxvSLoK3H5YSQ

The ultimate declaration of Christian non-duality.

Christ is in us already.

We are all the son of mankind.

I am that I am. Is the name god gave. And I can say with equal truth as the burning bush that I am that I am.

I am saves. Is the name of Jesus.

Oh great mystery spoken plainly but cryptically.

A truth hidden in plain site for all to see but none to grasp.

I am the way the truth and the life.

I am the truth.

Who are you?

Who says I am when you say i am?

All things are from god through god and to god.

There is nothing but god.

I am god

You’re a commie but you probably don’t know it

Most people when you get down to it agree with communism but they don’t know its called communism, socialism or Marxism.

Because they don’t know what it is they think the USSR was communist.

It wasn’t.

During the 19th century there was a debate amongst the socialists about how to get the means of production out of the hands of private individuals and into the hands of the workers.

One side said that we could use the political institutions (like representative government) to peacefully gain control of the state.

Once control of the state was achieved then they could use the states power to take the means of production from private individuals and give it to society.

Then the state would give more power to the people. Eventually you would have a kind of anarchism. Where the state was either non existent or acted as a pragmatic help for the will of the people.

The only difference between the communists and the socialists was over how to gain control of the state.

The communists were for a violent take over.

Which they did in 1911 I think.

Lenin said that what they had then wasn’t communism but a step towards it.

A bit later Stalin said it was communism.

But it wasn’t because yes the state had taken the means of production but it hadnt given them to the society.

In effect the state became the sole capitalist (USSR, China and most so called communist nations are really examples of state capitalism)

It was a failed attempt at bringing about socialism. All because the attempts to bring it about have failed so far doesn’t mean it is bad or wrong.

All that failed attempts indicate is that a learning process is occurring.

There were numerous failed attempts before capitalism managed to take over from feudalism.

And many atrocities especially committed against children in the industrial revolution.

Sexual objectification

Sex object is one level of a man or a woman.

One of my favourite levels.

But there are others.

People are silly for denying the sex object level.

Why do you want to diminish yourself.

You’re a sex object, an intellectual mind, an emotional being and a spiritual entity.

All because you are a sex object doesnt mean you’re not anything else.